Contractualism is a theoretical model created to explain the emergence of society. This theory is based on the idea that human beings lived in a pre-social state, called the state of nature, and abandoned it to sign a pact, the social contract.
Theories of contractualism arise from the need to explain the fact that human beings have organized themselves around societies governed by laws created by the State.
The thinkers who developed this school of thought are known as contractual philosophers. Contractors claim that before the social contract, all human beings were free and equal, living according to the laws of nature.
In the meantime, they will sign a social pact and abandon their natural freedom to build a society that guarantees their right to property.
Thus, contractualism will represent the abandonment of natural freedom and the emergence of civil freedom subject to the laws. The State was born with the function of formulating laws that all individuals must follow.
Contractors and the different perspectives on the social contract
Contractors differ on the factors that led human beings to abandon the state of nature and the realization of the social contract.
Thus, the three main contractual theories were developed by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Each has its own definition of the state of nature and the reason for the emergence of society.
These thinkers are also known as naturalists for recognizing that individuals have natural rights.
Hobbes and the social contract as a guarantee of peace
For Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), the human being guided by his natural tendency to violence, in a state of nature was in a constant war of all against all.
The Hobbesian social contract arises out of fear of a violent death. Thus, it is decided to give up natural freedom in favor of a State that can guarantee peace and security for its citizens.
Locke and law-based freedom
Contractualist John Locke (1632-1704) refuted Hobbes’s theory of a state of constant war. For him, there is no state of war, but human beings are naturally selfish and that selfishness leads to disputes of interests.
Locke is known as the “father of liberalism. He said that human beings have the natural right to property and the state should act as the guarantor of that right.
In order to resolve disputes generated by rival interests, there must be a mediating power to which everyone must be subject.
The social contract represents the acceptance and validation of the State’s mediating power in its ability to guarantee freedom and the right to property based on laws.
Learn more at: John Locke .
Rousseau and the common good
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) is a contractor who has a very different view from his predecessors. Rousseau argued that the state of nature was a peaceful period and that human beings are naturally good.
According to him, the human being would be a “good savage”. In their natural state, human beings would live in harmony with each other and with nature, as other animals do.
However, the emergence of private property has generated inequality between individuals and, consequently, an environment of tension between landowners and landowners.
To solve this problem, the social contract is signed so that the State can guarantee the maintenance of the right to property and the regulation of the whole society.
Thus, the State emerges as a tool at the service of citizens with the aim of respecting the general will and restraining action by particular interests.
To learn more, read: Jean-Jacques Rousseau .
General definitions of contractualism and the rise of civil society
Despite the distinctions between contractual theories, some points in common can be defined:
- Human beings in a state of nature are understood as free and equal.
- Some factors lead individuals to abandon natural freedom and sign the social contract.
- The social contract gives rise to society.
- In the social contract, natural freedom is replaced by civil freedom.
- The emergence of the State submits individuals to a greater power that is manifested through laws.
- Laws represent social order, impose limits on individuals who aim to regulate social interactions.